NUTRIC Score Is Not Superior to mNUTRIC Score in Prediction of Mortality of COVID-19 Patients

Objectives The NUTRIC (nutrition risk in the critically ill) score and the modified NUTRIC score are two scoring systems that show the nutritional risk status and severity of acute disease of patients. The only difference between them is the examination of interleukin-6 (IL-6) level. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not the NUTRIC score is superior to the mNUTRIC score in the prediction of mortality of patients with COVID-19 followed up in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Material and Method. This retrospective study included 322 patients followed up in ICU with a diagnosis of COVID-19. A record was made of demographic data, laboratory values, clinical results, and mortality status. All the data of the patients were compared between high and low variations of the NUTRIC score and the mNUTRIC score. Results A high NUTRIC score was determined in 62 patients and a high mNUTRIC score in 86 patients. The need for invasive mechanical ventilation, the use of vasopressors in ICU, the development of acute kidney injury, and mortality rates were statistically significantly higher in the patients with high NUTRIC and high mNUTRIC scores than in those with low scores (p = 0.0001 for all). The AUC values were 0.791 for high NUTRIC score and 0.786 for high mNUTRIC score (p = 0.0001 for both). No statistically significant difference was determined between the two scoring systems. Conclusion Although the NUTRIC score was seen to be superior to the mNUTRIC score, no statistically significant difference was determined. Therefore, when IL-6 cannot be examined, the mNUTRIC score can be considered safe and effective for the prediction of mortality in COVID-19 patients.

NUTRIC Score Is Not Superior to mNUTRIC Score in Prediction of Mortality of COVID-19 Patients.

Objectives: The NUTRIC (nutrition risk in the critically ill) score and the modified NUTRIC score are two scoring systems that show the nutritional risk status and severity of acute disease of patients. The only difference between them is the examination of interleukin-6 (IL-6) level. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not the NUTRIC score is superior to the mNUTRIC score in the prediction of mortality of patients with COVID-19 followed up in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Material and Method. This retrospective study included 322 patients followed up in ICU with a diagnosis of COVID-19. A record was made of demographic data, laboratory values, clinical results, and mortality status. All the data of the patients were compared between high and low variations of the NUTRIC score and the mNUTRIC score. Results: A high NUTRIC score was determined in 62 patients and a high mNUTRIC score in 86 patients. The need for invasive mechanical ventilation, the use of vasopressors in ICU, the development of acute kidney injury, and mortality rates were statistically significantly higher in the patients with high NUTRIC and high mNUTRIC scores than in those with low scores (p = 0.0001 for all). The AUC values were 0.791 for high NUTRIC score and 0.786 for high mNUTRIC score (p = 0.0001 for both). No statistically significant difference was determined between the two scoring systems. Conclusion: Although the NUTRIC score was seen to be superior to the mNUTRIC score, no statistically significant difference was determined. Therefore, when IL-6 cannot be examined, the mNUTRIC score can be considered safe and effective for the prediction of mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Can prognostic nutritional index predict mortality in intensive care patients with COVID-19?

OBJECTIVES: PNI is a calculated parameter using the albumin and the lymphocyte count from the CBC, which demonstrates the immunological and nutritional status of the patient. The aim of this study is to show the relationship between PNI and mortality in COVID-19 patients and to reveal a PNI cut-off value for mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data of 690 PCR positive COVID-19 ICU patients were recorded. COVID-19 ICU patients were divided into two groups; the first group consisted of survivors, while the second group consisted of patients who died in the ICU. Patients were also evaluated in two groups according to the PNI cut-off value that predicted mortality (PNI ≤ 42.00, PNI ≥ 43) and were compared in terms of demographics, laboratory parameters, clinical findings and mortality rates. RESULTS: When 690 COVID-19 patients were divided into two groups as survivors (50.6%) and deceased (49.4%) in intensive care, PNI value was significantly lower in the deceased group compared to the surviving group (P < .001). The PNI cut-off value predicting mortality was determined as ≤42. Patients were classified into two groups according to the PNI cut-off value. PNI ≤42 was determined as an independent risk factor for mortality (OR:2.9 P < .001). AUC values for PNI, albumin, and lymphocyte were 0.628, 0.612, and 0.590, respectively; P < .001 for all. CONCLUSION: PNI is an inexpensive method that can be easily calculated on the basis of routine laboratory parameters. We believe that the PNI value of COVID-19 patients on admission to the ICU may be an independent factor to predict mortality.